The long and short of it

May 10, 2007

OK, so I buy one of those modern-cut blouses with the three-quarter sleeves and shorter, slightly flared body. Then I buy a pair of those pants that say they fit “slightly below the waist.” I try to wear the blouse and pants together and…how the heck do I keep the blouse tucked in?! I want to wear them to work, together, and the “untucked” look is about as acceptable in my office as a “Free Paris!” t-shirt. My answer: get the blouse in a regular Misses’ size and not Petite. that way I have the option of tucking it in, or not. This worked out well with the Land’s End stretch jeans and blouse I recently ordered. But really…what are manufacturers thinking? Practicality does not seem to be at the top of their priority list! I just hope and pray for the end of this low-slung pants trend (“at the waist,” “slightly below the waist,” …geez–as if buying pants that fit weren’t confusing enough already!).

Entry Filed under: blouses, clothes, pants. .

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Ah HAA!!! I’m sleuthing out ridiculousness in fashion…one shoe at a time!

FashionDetective

Recent Comments

akriti on An open letter to the shoe…
akriti on An open letter to the shoe…
Albina-rd on An open letter to the shoe…
Akriti on Department store angst
Kilo on Department store angst

Archives

Blogroll

fashion

jewelry

plus size fashion

TV show